SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria Explained: What They Cover and Which to Include
What Security, Availability, Confidentiality, Processing Integrity and Privacy each cover, how often they're included, and how to decide which belong in your SOC 2 report.

What Security, Availability, Confidentiality, Processing Integrity and Privacy each cover, how often they're included, and how to decide which belong in your SOC 2 report.

Every SOC 2 report covers Security. The other four Trust Services Criteria (Availability, Confidentiality, Processing Integrity and Privacy) are a choice, and the right choice depends on what your customers rely on you for.
This guide explains what each criterion covers, how often each is included, and how to decide which belong in your report.
They're the five areas a SOC 2 report can cover. Security is mandatory; the rest are included when they're relevant to your service and your customers.
| Criterion | What it covers | How often it's included |
|---|---|---|
| Security | Protecting systems and data against unauthorized access; the foundation for the others | Every report |
| Availability | Keeping your service reliable and available as committed | 50–70% of reports |
| Confidentiality | Classifying and protecting confidential data according to its sensitivity | 50–70% of reports |
| Processing Integrity | Complete, accurate processing and outputs that users rely on | Under 20% of reports |
| Privacy | Protecting personal data and individuals' rights over it | Under 20% of reports |
Yes. The common criteria at the core of every SOC 2 cover Security by default, so including it takes no additional work.
Security also underpins everything else. You can't have confidentiality, availability, processing integrity or privacy without basic comfort over the security of the underlying systems.
In most cases, yes. Some companies still prefer to start with Security alone, but most mature enterprises want to see Availability and Confidentiality too. Without them, you can end up with a SOC 2 report that doesn't answer all the questions your enterprise customers ask. See getting through enterprise security reviews.
Both are relatively small add-ons. Throughline includes them free with every SOC 2, and we recommend clients include them because they present a more complete picture to enterprises.
There are a few reasons to leave one or both out:
Keeping the first report lean. Some companies exclude them to limit what they take on first, then add them later.
Not ready for Availability yet. Early-stage companies may lack the infrastructure, such as an on-premise system in a single location without environmental controls or a second site. Others have no auto-scaling or capacity forecasting yet, because with trial customers or no revenue, there isn't enough reason to have those processes.
Availability isn't relevant. If you don't commit to uptime, your service isn't critical, or your customer hosts the service in their own environment, Availability may simply not apply.
Availability is about committing to support your service so it's reliable and always available. On-premise, that means redundancy, contingencies, monitoring and backup arrangements. In the cloud, it means having the right processes to monitor the service and keep it reliable.
These questions come up constantly in enterprise due diligence: Do you have backups? Do you have business continuity plans? Is redundancy built into your service? What are your service commitments, and what's your historical uptime?
Security covers some of this by default, but Availability adds a separate dimension to the value of your service. Security is about protection; Availability is about reliability, and customers value it highly.
Confidentiality goes a level beyond Security. Security says all data should be restricted to people with a legitimate business need. Confidentiality recognizes different levels of sensitivity, and expects data to be classified, clearly marked and handled according to its level.
In practice, that means a data classification policy, so people understand each level and why it matters; highly confidential information restricted to the fewest people possible; confidential material, including hard copies, marked so it isn't exposed or shared by accident; and extra levels, such as mission-critical or top-secret data, that need additional clearance where relevant.
Typical controls include data classification, retention and handling policies. They set how long each class of data is kept, what triggers its removal, and how strict system controls are for each class.
The approach should be risk-based. Every system balances convenience against lockdown, and the more sensitive the data, the more it should be locked down. Confidentiality also lays the baseline for Privacy where personal data is involved.
Include it when your users rely critically on something your service calculates or processes. Processing Integrity is built around completeness and accuracy: is processing complete, and are the outputs accurate against the system's defined objectives?
The controls follow the data through the system:
Inputs. Is all the data needed for the calculation present and correct?
Processing. Is processing monitored, with error reporting and ways to resolve problems?
Outputs. How critical are they, what could go wrong, and how are reported errors handled?
User checks. Are there controls for users reviewing the outputs?
Most reports include a complementary user entity control making users responsible for checking that outputs suit their needs. But some enterprises want assurance that the vendor also takes responsibility for accuracy.
Compliance platforms are a good example. Their automated tests tell customers and auditors whether controls are passing, such as whether encryption is applied to production databases. Processing Integrity lets auditors point to controls over whether those tests can be relied on. See do you need a compliance platform?
Include it when you handle personal data and your customers need assurance for their own privacy obligations. Privacy regulations such as GDPR apply regardless of SOC 2. Including Privacy in your report shows you have the controls enterprises rely on as data controllers to stay compliant themselves.
The Privacy criteria cover a privacy policy that tells users what data is collected, why, how it's used, and how to exercise their rights; risk assessments, roles and responsibilities, and how personal data is secured; data sovereignty, where data is located, and who controls it; how long personal data is retained; and how privacy and data requests are handled.
Privacy is rarely included because it adds a lot of scope and work, and it's one of the riskier, more sensitive areas of assurance. Where it is included, it can support customers with GDPR and other privacy obligations around the world.
Processing Integrity and Privacy are almost always priced as add-ons, while some firms also charge for Availability and Confidentiality. See our guide to the true cost of SOC 2 for what to check in a quote, and our readiness guide for confirming scope early.
| Include | When |
|---|---|
| Security | Always; it's in every SOC 2 |
| Availability | In most cases, unless you have no uptime commitments, your customers host the service, or you aren't ready yet |
| Confidentiality | In most cases, especially if you hold sensitive customer data |
| Processing Integrity | When customers rely critically on your system's calculations or outputs |
| Privacy | When you process personal data and customers need support for their own privacy obligations |

Former PwC manager, founder of AssuranceLab and former Sensiba partner and Chief Innovation Officer. Now co-founder of Throughline, focused on compliance and assurance for AI-native companies.
SOC 2 for AI-native companies: simpler stacks, agents running the program in your own tools, concise policies, and a report that covers AI in production.
ISO 42001 isn't yet an enterprise requirement. What it covers, how it compares with SOC 2 and AIUC-1, and when it's worth it for an AI company.
How to cover production AI agents in SOC 2: governance, access, change management and monitoring, with indicative criteria mappings, customer responsibilities and practical audit expectations.
Australian companies need a SOC 2 report issued under the AICPA standards by a US-licensed CPA firm, delivered by a strong local team in Australian time zones. Here's how the provider options compare, and what to check.
Experienced CTOs don't choose a SOC 2 audit firm on price or speed. They look for tech stack expertise, a tailored approach, flexible scheduling, responsiveness and year-round partnership, because those factors decide how much time the audit really costs.
Which SOC 2 report should come first? Six client cases, practical decision tables and an illustrative 18-month cost comparison explain when to start with Type 1 and when to go straight to Type 2.
How long a SOC 2 Type 2 observation period should be, how to work backwards from a customer deadline, when auditors test, why reports run late and how much buffer to build in.
A category-by-category SOC 2 budget in USD, covering audit fees, readiness, platforms, penetration testing, consultants, internal assessments and operational costs. Learn what is required, what is optional, and what a quote can leave out.
Five signals of real quality in assurance and security, with practical guidance on building a compliance program that supports customer TPRM, repeatable enterprise reviews and revenue growth.
The person leading your SOC 2 audit is the most underrated factor in choosing an audit firm. Companies compare price, timelines and platform integrations, then barely ask who will actually do the work.
SOC 2 is a risk report, not a certificate. Understand how enterprise customers use it, why having a report is only base camp, and how to turn your audit into a trust asset for growing revenue.
What readiness should cover, when to involve your auditor, which gaps matter most, and how readiness, Type 1 and Type 2 can work as one continuous engagement. A practical guide to preparing for a report your customers can rely on.
CPA firm registration, signing licenses and peer review are the starting point, not proof of quality. A practical guide to checking credentials and asking the questions that matter before choosing your SOC 2 auditor.
Neither is better for everyone. The right choice depends on your customers, how you run security and where you are headed. For AI-native and AI-centric companies, SOC 2's flexible criteria usually make it the stronger starting point.
There's a basic psychology behind why most people don't like audits. Fix this, and people are surprisingly happy to do them again.
Enterprise buyers use SOC 2 as an initial qualifier, then look deeper. A quality report is what carries you through that assessment and turns your compliance investment into real trust.
Audit quality isn't service quality, and it isn't only professional standards. The real test is whether a reader of your report thinks: this tells me what I need to know.
Enterprise security teams review you in the background and rarely give feedback. What they look at beyond SOC 2, what counts as a genuine pen test, and how a quality report does the heavy lifting.
Compliance from first principles, the 95% problem, the compliance metadata AI needs, rethinking screenshots, spreadsheets and policies, and why audits should meet clients where they are.