ASAE 3150 assurance on controls
Understand the Australian assurance standard and the report supporting your CDR accreditation application.
Sydney headquartered CPA firm serving Australian and US companies
01
What ASAE 3150 does
ASAE 3150, Assurance Engagements on Controls, is an Australian standard issued by the Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (AUASB). It sets out how an assurance practitioner plans, performs and reports an engagement on controls against suitable criteria.
It is a reporting standard, not a control checklist or a certification scheme. The criteria, control boundary, assurance level and assessment date or period need to be defined for the purpose of the engagement.
02
How it supports CDR accreditation
The Consumer Data Right gives consumers a way to authorise access to their data. Organisations applying for accreditation need to demonstrate that they meet the requirements relevant to their participation pathway, including information security requirements.
Where an independent assurance report is required, an ASAE 3150 engagement assesses the controls protecting the CDR environment against the applicable criteria. Throughline conducts the engagement and issues the report. The ACCC assesses the application and makes the accreditation decision; an assurance conclusion does not guarantee accreditation.
03
Agree the report before collecting evidence
Start with your intended CDR role, services, data flows, systems and outsourced arrangements. Then confirm the current accreditation guidance, required report form, assurance level, control assertions and reporting date or period. Different participation pathways should not be assumed to have identical requirements.
The engagement may address control design, implementation or operating effectiveness, depending on its agreed purpose. Evidence needs to support the actual conclusion required, rather than simply demonstrate that policies exist.
04
What management owns, and what we assess
Management owns the controls, the description of the environment and the evidence of how those controls operate. That includes decisions about access, data retention, suppliers, incident handling and the people accountable for them.
We independently evaluate the agreed subject matter, perform the required assurance procedures and report the conclusion and relevant findings. A named senior practitioner stays accountable from scoping through report issuance. Readiness feedback does not transfer management responsibility to the auditor.
05
ASAE 3150, SOC 2 and ISO 27001 are different outcomes
ASAE 3150 is an Australian assurance standard that can be applied to defined control criteria. SOC 2 is an AICPA attestation report against the Trust Services Criteria. ISO 27001 is certification of an information security management system. None should be represented as automatically interchangeable.
Existing SOC 2 or ISO 27001 work can provide useful controls and evidence for a CDR engagement. Whether it meets a particular accreditation requirement must be checked against current guidance. If a customer asks for SOC 2, an ASAE 3150 report is not an AICPA SOC 2 report.
Requirements can change. Check the current CDR accreditation guidance and the applicable AUASB standard before setting your scope.
Plan your CDR assurance engagement.
Speak with a senior practitioner about your accreditation pathway, control environment and the report you need.